From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Francis

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2021
1:05-CR-487 NONE (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:05-CR-487 NONE

06-16-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REED DANIEL FRANCIS, Defendant.


DETENTION ORDER (VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE)

Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The defendant having been arrested for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of supervised release; and Having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.l(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), the Court orders the above-named defendant detained and finds that:

[x] The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant is not likely to flee; and/or
[X] The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).
This finding is based on the reasons stated on the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Francis

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2021
1:05-CR-487 NONE (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REED DANIEL FRANCIS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

1:05-CR-487 NONE (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)