From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Francis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov 17, 2020
No. 20-11264 (11th Cir. Nov. 17, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-11264

11-17-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HENRY FRANCIS, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:93-cr-00158-JDW-TGW-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before JORDAN, LUCK, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Juliann Welch, appointed counsel for Henry Francis, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct given the district court's exercise of discretion in denying Francis' motion under the First Step Act. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of Francis' motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Francis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov 17, 2020
No. 20-11264 (11th Cir. Nov. 17, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HENRY FRANCIS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 17, 2020

Citations

No. 20-11264 (11th Cir. Nov. 17, 2020)