Opinion
21-6023
10-06-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHEYENNE FRAGALE, Defendant-Appellant.
Cheyenne Fragale, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: August 9, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:17-cr-00112-1)
Cheyenne Fragale, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Cheyenne Fragale appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Fragale's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fragale, No. 5:17-cr-00112-1 (S.D. W.Va. Nov. 23, 2020). We deny Fragale's motion to amend or correct the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED