From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fox

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Aug 29, 1991
943 F.2d 1218 (10th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2048.

August 29, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, EBEL, Circuit Judge, and NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.

Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado, sitting by designation.


ORDER

Defendant appealed the district court's sentence following a guilty plea. By opinion filed April 18, 1991, 930 F.2d 820, this court affirmed defendant's sentence in part but remanded the cause to the district court to clarify the reason for its refusal to depart downward from the Guidelines. The court now has for consideration the district court's clarification dated August 13, 1991.

In view of the district court's statement that it exercised discretion in denying a downward department, despite the Guideline authority for such departure, this court lacks jurisdiction to review that discretionary decision. See U.S. v. Soto, 918 F.2d 882, 883-84 (10th Cir. 1990).

Therefore, in accordance with the court's April 18, 1991, opinion and this order, the court affirms the sentence imposed by the district court.


Summaries of

United States v. Fox

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Aug 29, 1991
943 F.2d 1218 (10th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

United States v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BRUCE C. FOX…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Aug 29, 1991

Citations

943 F.2d 1218 (10th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. McHenry

Defendant now argues in this appeal that when it reduced his criminal history category from category VI to…

U.S. v. Garcia

Although we have no jurisdiction to review a district court's discretionary decision refusing to depart…