Opinion
Criminal Action 1:19-cr-0308-AT-RGV-3-7
09-19-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. QUANTAVIUS FOSTER, AMADEO GAMA- AGUIRRE,
ORDER
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [439] that this Court deny Defendants' Motions to Suppress Statements [Docs. 344, 348, 372, 381].
A district judge has broad discretion to accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 680 (1980). The Court notes that no objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation for clear error and finds none.
Accordingly, the Court receives the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation with approval and hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court [Doc. 439]. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 344], Motion to Suppress Statements as Supplemented [Doc. 348], Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 372], and Motion to Suppress Evidence as perfected [Doc. 381].
IT IS SO ORDERED.