From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Forkner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CR NO. S-08-363 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CR NO. S-08-363 GEB

01-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. David Forkner, Defendants.

John R. Manning Attorney at Law Ca. St. Bar No. 220874 Attorney for Defendant David Robbie Forkner Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


John R. Manning

Attorney at Law

Ca. St. Bar No. 220874

Attorney for Defendant

David Robbie Forkner

STIPULATION AND

ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE


Date: January 27, 2012

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garland E.

Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant David Forkner, John R. Manning Esq., that the status conference currently set for January 20, 2012, be continued to January 27, 2012, at which time the defendant anticipates entering a change of plea. The parties also stipulate that the time beginning January 18, 2012, and extending through January 27, 2012, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties request to exclude time for defense preparation. The defense requests more time to review and discuss the proposed plea agreement.

The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 USC § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and (Local T-4).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

_________________________

JOHN R. MANNING

Attorney for Defendant

David Robbie Forkner

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

by: _________________________

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

David Forkner, Defendants.

Case No. CR.S 08-363 GEB


ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, January 18, 2012, through and including January 27, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. It is further ordered that the January 20, 2012 status conference shall be continued until January 27, 2012, at 9:00a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Forkner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CR NO. S-08-363 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Forkner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. David Forkner, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

CR NO. S-08-363 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)