From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Forkner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
CR NO. S-08-363 GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

CR NO. S-08-363 GEB

09-27-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. David Forkner and Loretta Canham, Defendants.

JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant David Robbie Forkner DENNIS S. WAKS Attorney for Defendant Loretta Leigh Canham Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


John R. Manning

Attorney at Law

Ca. St. Bar No. 220874

Attorney for Defendant

David Robbie Forkner

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garland E.

Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant David Forkner, John R. Manning Esq., and counsel for defendant Loretta Leigh Canham, Dennis S. Waks Esq., that the status conference currently set for September 30, 2011, be continued to November 4, 2011, and stipulate that the time beginning September 30, 2011, and extending through November 4, 2011, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties request to exclude time for defense preparation. This matter involves a wire intercept on several telephones and related pen registers, as well as over 3000 pages of discovery.

The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 USC § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and (Local T-4).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

JOHN R. MANNING

Attorney for Defendant

David Robbie Forkner

DENNIS S. WAKS

Attorney for Defendant

Loretta Leigh Canham

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

David Forkner and Loretta Canham, Defendants

Case No. CR.S 08-363 GEB

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the September 30, 2011 status conference be continued to November 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFOR IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to November 4, 2011.

GARLAND E. BURRELL,

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Forkner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
CR NO. S-08-363 GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Forkner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. David Forkner and Loretta Canham…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

CR NO. S-08-363 GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)