From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fontenot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Nov 27, 2018
CASE NUMBER 6:18-CR-00064-JRG (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER 6:18-CR-00064-JRG

11-27-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFERY DAVID FONTENOT


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred a petition alleging violations of supervised release conditions to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence.

At the close of the revocation hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn recommended: 1. that the court find that the Defendant violated the allegation in the petition that alleges that he violated a mandatory condition of release; 2. that the Defendant's supervised release should be revoked pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583; and 3. the Defendant should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 11 months' imprisonment, which shall include the 180 days of Fontenot's unserved community confinement (converted to an equivalent term of imprisonment), with a twelve month term of supervised release to follow. The first 180 days of the new term of supervised release should be served in community confinement. The Defendant requested to serve his prison term at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont. The Defendant's request should be accommodated, if possible.

At the close of the revocation hearing, the defendant, defense counsel and counsel for the government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in the magistrate judge's report, consenting to revocation of supervised release and imposition of the sentence recommended. Defendant also waived his right to be present with counsel and to speak at sentencing before the court imposes the recommended sentence.

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition is GRANTED and the Defendant's supervised release is REVOKED.

Judgment and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendations.

So Ordered this

Nov 27, 2018

/s/_________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Fontenot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Nov 27, 2018
CASE NUMBER 6:18-CR-00064-JRG (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Fontenot

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFERY DAVID FONTENOT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Nov 27, 2018

Citations

CASE NUMBER 6:18-CR-00064-JRG (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 2018)