From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Floyd

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 5, 2023
6:22-cr-00023 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 5, 2023)

Opinion

6:22-cr-00023

09-05-2023

United States of America v. Dajamuel Dione Floyd


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love for the administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 56. The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant's guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the information. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate judge's findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the magistrate judge's findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. The court also accepts defendant's plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant's guilty plea, the court finds defendant Dajamuel Dione Floyd guilty of count one of the information, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

United States v. Floyd

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 5, 2023
6:22-cr-00023 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 5, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Dajamuel Dione Floyd

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 5, 2023

Citations

6:22-cr-00023 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 5, 2023)