From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Flowers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
Case No. 1:08-cr-88 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cr-88

12-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONNIE MELVIN FLOWERS, Defendant.


HON. JANET T. NEFF


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant Ronnie Melvin Flowers has filed a motion for modification or reduction of sentence (Dkt 75) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) based on the modification of the Drug Quantity Table with respect to cocaine base (crack cocaine).

Section 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce the term of imprisonment of a defendant who has been sentenced based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Amendment 750 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines modified U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, the Drug Quantity Table with regard to cocaine base (crack cocaine), and U.S.S.G. § 2D2.1(b). These modifications were made retroactive effective November 1, 2011. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c).

However, the defendant is ineligible for a reduction in sentence as his new calculation does not result in a lower guideline range.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for modification of sentence (Dkt 75) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is DENIED.

______________________

JANET T. NEFF

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Flowers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
Case No. 1:08-cr-88 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Flowers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONNIE MELVIN FLOWERS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cr-88 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2012)