From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Flores-Rosas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 19, 2012
479 F. App'x 149 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-10226 D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00799-JAT

09-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PERFECTO FLORES-ROSAS, a.k.a. Javier Dominguez-Flores, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Perfecto Flores-Rosas appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Flores-Rosas's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Flores-Rosas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Flores-Rosas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 19, 2012
479 F. App'x 149 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Flores-Rosas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PERFECTO FLORES-ROSAS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 19, 2012

Citations

479 F. App'x 149 (9th Cir. 2012)