From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Flores-Cordero

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 4, 2013
No. 12-10220 (9th Cir. Oct. 4, 2013)

Opinion


United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margarito Flores-Cordero, Defendant-Appellant. No. 12-10220 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit October 4, 2013

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02432-CKJ-GEE-1

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge.

The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d 1085, is amended as follows:

1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line 2 of the third full paragraph, insert "or risk" between the words "application" and "of."

2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line 4 of the second full paragraph, delete the word "serious."

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Flores-Cordero

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 4, 2013
No. 12-10220 (9th Cir. Oct. 4, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Flores-Cordero

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margarito Flores-Cordero…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 4, 2013

Citations

No. 12-10220 (9th Cir. Oct. 4, 2013)