From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Flores

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 19, 2014
584 F. App'x 577 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-50356

08-19-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CESAR JOSE FLORES, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 8:05-cr-00145-JVS MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cesar Jose Flores appeals from the 26-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Flores's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Flores

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 19, 2014
584 F. App'x 577 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CESAR JOSE FLORES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

584 F. App'x 577 (9th Cir. 2014)