From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fletes-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
No. 2:11-CR-00096 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-00096 JAM

10-17-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO FLETES-LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.

MICHAEL E. HANSEN Attorney for Defendant MARCELA SANTAMARIA LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO HERNANDEZ-MELENDEZ Michael E. Hansen for ARTURO HERNANDEZ Attorney for Defendant ALEJANDRO FLETES-LOPEZ LAW OFFICES OF DONALD MASUDA By: Michael E. Hansen for KENNY GIFFARD DONALD MASUDA Attorneys for Defendant IRMA GONZALEZ LAW OFFICES OF TIM A. PORI Michael E. Hansen for TIM PORI Attorney for Defendant ORLANDO FLETES-LOPEZ CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER LAW OFFICES Michael E. Hansen for CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER Attorney for Defendant JESUS SANCHEZ-LOPEZ LAW OFFICE OF OLAF W. HEDBERG Michael E. Hansen for OLAF HEDBERG Attorney for Defendant GERMAN GONZALEZ VELAZQUEZ LAW OFFICES OF DINA L. SANTOS Michael E. Hansen for DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant MAURICIO PORTILLO LAW OFFICE OF CLEMENTE M. JIMENEZ Michael E. Hansen for CLEMENTE JIMENEZ Attorney for Defendant CONSEPCION CARILLO LAW OFFICE OF GILBERT A. ROQUE Michael E. Hansen for GILBERT ROQUE Attorney for Defendant GUADALUPE REYES-ONTIVEROS LAW OFFICE OF HAYES H. GABLE, III Michael E. Hansen for HAYES GABLE, III Attorney for Defendant DIANA HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE By: Michael E. Hansen for MICHAEL BECKWITH PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorneys Attorneys for Plaintiff


Michael E. Hansen

Attorney at Law, SBN 191737

Attorney for Defendant

MARCELA SANTAMARIA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE,

AND TO EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT

TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Michael Beckwith and Paul Hemesath, Assistant United States Attorneys, attorneys for plaintiff; Arturo Hernandez, attorney for defendant Alejandro Fletes-Lopez; Kenny Giffard and Donald Masuda, attorneys for defendant Irma Gonzalez; Tim Pori, attorney for defendant Orlando Fletes-Lopez; Christopher Haydn-Myer, attorney for defendant Jesus Sanchez-Lopez; Olaf Hedberg, attorney for defendant German Velazquez; Michael Hansen, attorney for defendant Marcela Santamaria; Dina Santos, attorney for defendant Mauricio Portillo; Clemente Jimenez, attorney for defendant Consepcion Carillo; Gilbert Roque, attorney for defendant Guadalupe Reyes-Ontiveros; and Hayes Gable, III, attorney for defendant Diana Hernandez-Gonzalez, that the previously-scheduled status conference date of October 18, 2011, be vacated and the matter set for status conference on November 8, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

This continuance is requested to allow counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case. Additionally, at least four defense attorneys are currently in trial in homicide cases in Sacramento and Yolo Counties.

The Government concurs with this request.

Further, the parties agree and stipulate the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), corresponding to Local Codes T2 [complex case] and T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare], from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 14, 2011, to and including November 8, 2011.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL E. HANSEN

Attorney for Defendant

MARCELA SANTAMARIA

LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO

HERNANDEZ-MELENDEZ

By: Michael E. Hansen for

ARTURO HERNANDEZ

Attorney for Defendant

ALEJANDRO FLETES-LOPEZ

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD MASUDA

By: Michael E. Hansen for

KENNY GIFFARD

DONALD MASUDA

Attorneys for Defendant

IRMA GONZALEZ

LAW OFFICES OF TIM A. PORI

By: Michael E. Hansen for

TIM PORI

Attorney for Defendant

ORLANDO FLETES-LOPEZ

CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER LAW

OFFICES

By: Michael E. Hansen for

CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER

Attorney for Defendant

JESUS SANCHEZ-LOPEZ

LAW OFFICE OF OLAF W. HEDBERG

Michael E. Hansen for

OLAF HEDBERG

Attorney for Defendant

GERMAN GONZALEZ VELAZQUEZ

LAW OFFICES OF DINA L. SANTOS

By: Michael E. Hansen for

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

MAURICIO PORTILLO

LAW OFFICE OF CLEMENTE M.

JIMENEZ

Michael E. Hansen for

CLEMENTE JIMENEZ

Attorney for Defendant

CONSEPCION CARILLO

LAW OFFICE OF GILBERT A. ROQUE

By: Michael E. Hansen for

GILBERT ROQUE

Attorney for Defendant

GUADALUPE REYES-ONTIVEROS

LAW OFFICE OF HAYES H. GABLE,

III

By: Michael E. Hansen for

HAYES GABLE, III

Attorney for Defendant

DIANA HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ

U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

By: Michael E. Hansen for

MICHAEL BECKWITH

PAUL HEMESATH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. section 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 14, 2011, to and including November 8, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and Local Codes T2 [complex case] and T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare]. It is further ordered that the October 18, 2011, status conference shall be continued until November 8, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Fletes-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
No. 2:11-CR-00096 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Fletes-Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO FLETES-LOPEZ, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-00096 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)