From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fleenor

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 15, 2022
2:14-CR-107 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:14-CR-107

06-15-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONYA ELIZABETH FLEENOR

Donald Wayne Taylor Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert C. Welch, II U.S. Probation Officer Donya Elizabeth Fleenor Defendant Kaycee M. Roberts Attorney for Defendant


Donald Wayne Taylor Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert C. Welch, II U.S. Probation Officer

Donya Elizabeth Fleenor Defendant Kaycee M. Roberts Attorney for Defendant

AGREED ORDER OF REVOCATION

The Honorable Thomas A. Varlan United States District Judge

A Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release has been filed against the defendant, Donya Elizabeth Fleenor, and the defendant admits that she has violated the conditions of her supervised release as specified in violation numbers 1-11 in the Amended Petition. An agreement has been reached between the parties, recommending that Ms. Fleenor's supervised release should be revoked and that she should receive time served followed by one year of supervised release.

Ms. Fleenor agrees to waive her right to a hearing pursuant to Rule 32 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, waive her right to allocute at a revocation hearing, and asks that the agreement of the defendant and the government pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure be found to be a proper sentence. In doing so, the defendant acknowledges that she is giving up the following rights:

(1) The right to the assistance of counsel for her defense.
(2) The right to see and hear all the witnesses and have them cross-examined in her defense.
(3) The right on her own part not to testify unless she chose to do so in her defense, and
(4) The right to the issuance of subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses to testify on her behalf.

The Court has considered the Chapter Seven policy statements in the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The violations above constitute Grade B violations for which an advisory guideline range of 8 to 14 months would apply given her Criminal History Category III. The Court has considered this advisory guideline range. The Court has also considered the statutory maximum of 11 months and 29 days imprisonment. The Court has also considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the recommended sentence is sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), while taking into consideration all of those factors and the Chapter Seven policy statements. Specifically, the Court finds that the defendant has admitted that the proof could establish by a preponderance of the evidence that she committed the violations as specified in violation numbers 1-11 in the Amended Petition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, therefore, that the defendant's supervised release is hereby revoked. The defendant is hereby sentenced to time served followed by one year of supervised release. While on supervised release, the defendant shall comply with the following mandatory conditions of supervision adopted by this Court in Local Rule 83.10:

(1) The defendant must not commit another federal, state, or local crime.
(2) Tire defendant must not unlawfully possess a controlled substance.
(3) The defendant must refrain from unlawful use of a controlled substance.
(4) The defendant must cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer.
To promote respect for the law, prevent recidivism, and aid in adequate supervision, the defendant shall also comply with the following standard conditions of supervision adopted by this Court in Local Rule 83.10:
(1) Tire defendant must report to the probation office in the federal judicial district where the defendant is authorized to reside within 72 hours of release from imprisonment or of the time you were sentenced, unless the probation officer
instructs the defendant to report to a different probation office or within a different time frame. Justification: This condition is an administrative requirement of supervision.
(2) After initially reporting to the probation office, the defendant will receive instructions from the Court or the probation officer about how and when the defendant must report to the probation officer, and the defendant must report to the probation officer as instructed. Justification: This condition is an administrative requirement of supervision.
(3) The defendant must not knowingly leave the federal judicial district where the defendant is authorized to reside without first getting permission from the Court or the probation officer. Justification: This condition is an administrative requirement of supervision.
(4) The defendant must answer truthfelly the questions asked by the defendant's probation officer. Justification: This condition is an administrative requirement of supervision.
(5) The defendant must live in a place approved by the probation officer. If the defendant plans to change where the defendant lives or anything about the defendant's living arrangements (such as the people the defendant lives with), the defendant must notify the probation officer at least 10 days before the change. If notifying the probation officer in advance is not possible due to unanticipated circumstances, the defendant must notify the probation officer within 72 hours of becoming aware of a change or expected change. Justification: This condition will assist the probation officer in monitoring the defendant for protection of the community.
(6) The defendant must allow the probation officer to visit the defendant at any time at the defendant's home or elsewhere, and the defendant must permit the probation officer to take any items prohibited by the conditions of the defendant's supervision that the probation officer observes in plain view. Justification: This condition will assist the probation officer in monitoring the defendant for protection of the community.
(7) The defendant must work fell time (at least 30 hours per week) at a lawfol type of employment, unless the probation officer excuses the defendant from doing so. If the defendant does not have fell-time employment, the defendant must try to find fell-time employment, unless the probation officer excuses the defendant from doing so. If the defendant plans to change where the defendant works or anything about the defendant's work (such as the defendant's position or job responsibilities), the defendant must notify the probation officer at least 10 days before the change. If notifying the probation officer at least 10 days in advance is not possible due to unanticipated circumstances, the defendant must notify the probation officer within 72 hours of becoming aware of a change or expected change. Justification: This condition will reduce the risk of recidivism and provide for defendant rehabilitation.
(8) The defendant must not communicate or interact with someone the defendant knows is engaged in criminal activity. If the defendant knows someone has been convicted of a felony, the defendant must not knowingly communicate or interact with that person without first getting the permission of the probation officer, Justification: This condition is aimed at reducing the risk of recidivism and providing for public safety.
(9) Ifthe defendant is arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer, the defendant must notify the probation officer within 72 hours. Justification: This condition will assist the probation officer in monitoring the defendant for protection of the community.
(10) The defendant must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon (i.e,, anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose ofcausing bodily injury or death to another person such as nunchakus or tasers). Justification; This condition will provide for public and officer safety.
(11) The defendant must not act or make any agreement with a law enforcement agency to act as a confidential human source or informant without first getting the permission of the Court. Justification; This condition is aimed at reducing ihe risk of reddivism and providing for public safety.
(12) Ifthe probation officer determines that the defendant poses a risk to another person (including an organization), the probation officer may require the defendant to notify the person about the risk and the defendant must comply with that instruction. The probation officer may contact the person and confirm that the defendant has notified the person about the risk. Justification; This condition is aimed at reducing the risk of reddivism and providing for public safety.
(13) The defendant must follow the instructions of the probation officer related to the conditions of supervision. Justification: This condition is an administrative requirement of supervision.

While on supervised release, the defendant shall also abide by the following special conditions:

(1) The defendant shall participate in a program of testing and/or treatment for drug and/or alcohol abuse, as directed by the probation officer, until such time as she- is released from the program by the probation officer. Defendant shall complete treatment at Transitions of Dyer County. Justification: This condition will reduce the risk of recidivism and provide for defendant rehabilitation.
(2) The defendant shall participate in a program of mental health treatment, as directed by the probation officer, until such time as she is released from the program by the probation officer. The defendant shall waive all rights to confidentiality regarding mental health treatment in order to allow release of information to the supervising
United States Probation Officer and to authorize open communication between the probation officer and the mental health treatment provider. Justification this condition will assist the probation officer in monitoring the defendant for protection of the community and for defendant rehabilitation
(3) The defendant shall submit his or her person, property house, vehiole, papers, [computers (as defined by 18 U.S.C, § 1030(e)(1)), other electronic communications or data storage devices or media, ] of office to a search conducted by a United States probation officer or designee. Fallure to submit to a search may be grounds for revocatioa of release. The defendant shall warn any other occupants that the premises may be subjetc to searches pursuant to this condition. An officer may conduct a search, puruant to this condition only when. reasonable suspicion exists that the defendant has violated a condition of his supervision and that the arous to be searched contaion evidence of this violation, Any search must be conducted at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, Justification This conditton will assist the probation officer in monitoring the defendant for protection of the comnmunity.


Summaries of

United States v. Fleenor

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 15, 2022
2:14-CR-107 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Fleenor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONYA ELIZABETH FLEENOR

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

2:14-CR-107 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 15, 2022)