From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fishman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
S6 20 Cr. 160 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)

Opinion

S6 20 Cr. 160 (MKV)

07-12-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SETH FISHMAN, Defendant.


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE MARY KAY VYSKOCIL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about November 25, 2022, SETH FISHMAN (the “Defendant”), among others, was charged in two counts of a six-count Superseding Indictment, S6 20 Cr. 160 (MKV) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to misbrand and adulterate drugs in interstate commerce with intent to defraud or mislead, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, and Title 21, United States Code, Sections 331 and 333 (Counts One and Two);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 334, and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all drugs that were adulterated or misbranded when introduced into or while in interstate commerce or while held for sale (whether or not the first sale) after shipment in interstate commerce, or which may not, under the provisions of section 331(ll), 344, or 355 of this title, have been introduced into interstate commerce, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the value of such property;

WHEREAS, on or about February 2, 2022, the Defendant was found guilty, following a jury trial, of Counts One and Two of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Court finds that the drugs that were adulterated or misbranded by the Defendant when introduced into or while in interstate commerce, or while held for sale (whether or not the first sale) after shipment in interstate commerce, or which may not, under the provisions of section 331(ll), 344, or 355 of this title, have been introduced into interstate commerce, are subject to forfeiture to the United States (the “Forfeitable Property”);

WHEREAS, the Court finds further that the value of the Forfeitable Property associated with Count One of the Indictment is $64,862, and the value of the Forfeitable Property associated with Count Two of the Indictment is $13,438,313.20;

WHEREAS, the Government seeks a money judgment in the amount of $13,503,176.20 in United States currency, of which $64,862 represents the value of the Forfeitable Property associated with Count One of the Indictment, and $13,438,313.20 represents the value of the property associated with Count Two of the Indictment; and

WHEREAS, the Court finds that as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the Forfeitable Property from the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment, to which the Defendant was found guilty following a jury trial, a money judgment in the amount of $13,503,176.20 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), of which $64,862 represents the value of the Forfeitable Property from the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, and $13,438,313.20 represents the value of the Forfeitable Property from the offense charged in Count Two of the Indictment, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant SETH FISHMAN and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Fishman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
S6 20 Cr. 160 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Fishman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SETH FISHMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

S6 20 Cr. 160 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)