From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Firm Build, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. 1:10-cr-00285 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cr-00285 LJO

10-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FIRM BUILD, INC., et al, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney SAMUEL WONG Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender FRANCINE ZEPEDA Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant RUDOLPH BUENDIA, III DOUGLAS C. FOSTER Ciummo and Associates Attorney for Defendant Joseph Cuellar CADEE PETERS Cadee Peters Attorney at Law Attorney for Defendant Patrick Bowman


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #91175

JEREMY S. KROGER, Bar #258956

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

RUDOLPH BUENDIA, III

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING AND ORDER

Date: November 14, 2011

Time: 1:00 p.m.

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the motions hearing currently set for October 21, 2011, may be continued to November 14, 2011, at 1:00 p.m.

The request is made by Counsel for the defendants. There is a Motion for Discovery pending. This motion was continued to allow the parties to complete the review of discovery. Counsel for Mr. Buendia and the other defendants are still completing their review of the discovery. Counsel is compiling a list of documents which they will request from the government. Counsel intends to meet and confer during this time period in order to be prepared on November 14, 2011, to advise the Court of the status of the discovery process. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for all parties and the Court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice herein for good cause pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) for effective defense preparation.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

SAMUEL WONG

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

FRANCINE ZEPEDA

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

RUDOLPH BUENDIA, III

DOUGLAS C. FOSTER

Ciummo and Associates

Attorney for Defendant

Joseph Cuellar

CADEE PETERS

Cadee Peters Attorney at Law

Attorney for Defendant

Patrick Bowman

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the above request to continue the Motion hearing now set for October 21, 2011, and good cause appearing, HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: The Motion hearing currently scheduled for October 21, 2011, is continued to November 14, 2011. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Firm Build, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. 1:10-cr-00285 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Firm Build, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FIRM BUILD, INC., et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. 1:10-cr-00285 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)