From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fields

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 25, 2013
546 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7080

11-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD FIELDS, Defendant - Appellant.

Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1) Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harold Fields appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fields, No. 2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We further note that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not the appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013).

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Fields

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 25, 2013
546 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD FIELDS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 25, 2013

Citations

546 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2013)