From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ferretiz-Hernandez

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 17, 2022
5:21-cr-63-JA-PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cr-63-JA-PRL

03-17-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE CESAR FERRETIZ-HERNANDEZ


ORDER

JOHN ANTOON II United States District Judge

This case is before the Court on Defendant Jorge Cesar Ferretiz

Hernandez's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 31). The assigned United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report (Doc. 78) recommending that Ferretiz-Hernandez's Motion be denied. Because Ferretiz-Hernandez admitted that an evidentiary hearing would not be needed if the Court allowed him to supplement his Motion to Dismiss with additional exhibits, the Report also recommends that the Court grant Ferretiz-Hernandez's Motion to Supplement (Doc. 68). Ferretiz-Hernandez filed an Objection (Doc. 79) to the Report, and the Government filed a Response (Doc. 84) to that Objection.

After reviewing the record in this matter, including Ferretiz-Hernandez's Objection and the Government's Response, the Court agrees with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 78) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. The Motion to Supplement (Doc. 68) is GRANTED.

3. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 31) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED on March 17, 2022.


Summaries of

United States v. Ferretiz-Hernandez

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 17, 2022
5:21-cr-63-JA-PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Ferretiz-Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE CESAR FERRETIZ-HERNANDEZ

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

5:21-cr-63-JA-PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2022)

Citing Cases

United States v. Romo-Martinez

CR 448 (CM), 2022 WL 2704036, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2022) (same); United States v. Guadalupe, No.…