From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Feng

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
No. CR-11-70565 MAG-(NG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-11-70565 MAG-(NG)

10-31-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD FENG, Defendant.

KIRSTIN M. AULT Assistant United States Attorney JODI LINKER Assistant Federal Public Defender


BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

JODI LINKER

Assistant Federal Public Defende

Counsel for Defendant FENG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE AND

EXCLUSION UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND RULE 5.1

The parties jointly request that, subject to the Court's approval, the preliminary hearing/arraignment presently set for November 3, 2011 be continued to November 22, 2011 at 9:30 am.

Defendant Edward Feng is charged in a criminal complaint with violating provisions of the federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). The parties are in negotiations on a pre-indictment resolution of the case. Additionally, defense counsel requires additional time to effectively prepare the defendant's case, including investigation and legal research of matters critical to the case. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the preliminary hearing or arraignment be continued from November 3, 2011 to November 22, 2011.

For the above reasons, the parties stipulate there is good cause - taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case - to extend the time limit under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 for the preliminary hearing or arraignment from November 3, 2011 to November 22, 2011. The parties further agree that the time from November 3, 2011 to November 22, 2011 should be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), and that failing to exclude that time would unreasonably deny the defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties further agree that the ends of justice would be served by excluding the time from November 3, 2011 to November 22, 2011 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act and that the need for the exclusion outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

KIRSTIN M. AULT

Assistant United States Attorney

JODI LINKER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Judge Joseph C. Sepro


Summaries of

United States v. Feng

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
No. CR-11-70565 MAG-(NG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Feng

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD FENG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

No. CR-11-70565 MAG-(NG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)