From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fender

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Apr 23, 2019
No. 18-2415 (8th Cir. Apr. 23, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-2415

04-23-2019

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Selica Jane Fender Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo [Unpublished] Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Selica Fender appeals from the sentence the District Court imposed after she pleaded guilty to a drug offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

Counsel argues that the District Court erred in denying safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). We reject this argument because we conclude that Fender failed to establish that she qualified for the relief sought. See United States v. Guerra-Cabrera, 477 F.3d 1021, 1025 (8th Cir. 2007) (stating that defendants must establish that they qualify for safety-valve relief).

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we have identified no non-frivolous issues for appeal. We grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.


Summaries of

United States v. Fender

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Apr 23, 2019
No. 18-2415 (8th Cir. Apr. 23, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Fender

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Selica Jane Fender…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 23, 2019

Citations

No. 18-2415 (8th Cir. Apr. 23, 2019)