From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Lynch v. Fay

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Aug 29, 1960
284 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 347, Docket 26207.

Argued June 13, 1960.

Decided August 29, 1960. Motion to Amend Order Denied December 2, 1960.

Jaffe Wachtell, New York City (David Jaffe, Herbert M. Wachtell, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., State of N.Y. (Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., George K. Bernstein, William G. Ross, Asst. Attys. Gen., of counsel), for appellants.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.

Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.


We have been informed that petitioner died on July 30, 1960, after submission of his appeal, but prior to a determination thereof.

The appeal is dismissed as moot.


On Motion to Amend Order


Petition denied.


I would grant the petition to amend. Although the appeal is moot by reason of William Lynch's death, the proper procedure indicated by the Supreme Court in United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 1950, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36, and recently by this court in Bodkin v. United States, 2 Cir., 1959,

266 F.2d 55, 56, in my opinion is to dismiss the appeal, vacate the district court's judgment and remand with directions to dismiss. I would adopt this procedure.


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Lynch v. Fay

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Aug 29, 1960
284 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1960)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Lynch v. Fay

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. William LYNCH, Petitioner-Appellee, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Aug 29, 1960

Citations

284 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

United States ex Rel. Schwartz v. Lennox

While the Commonwealth does not dispute this, it does strenuously argue that this case became moot upon the…

Perez v. State of New York

The determination whether a defendant intelligently and understandingly waived his right to counsel rests on…