From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Faustino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
No. CR-S-11-0304-WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S-11-0304-WBS

09-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NATANAEL FAUSTINO Defendant.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender DOUGLAS BEEVERS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant NATANAEL FAUSTINO BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney PAUL HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS, U.S.V.I. Bar #766

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

NATANAEL FAUSTINO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: October 17, 2011

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from September 19, 2011, to October 17, 2011 at 8:30 a.m. They stipulate that the time between September 19, 2011 and October 17, 2011 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Specifically, counsel needs additional time to negotiate a resolution to this matter and to review discovery that was recently provided. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

NATANAEL FAUSTINO

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

PAUL HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for September 19, 2011, be continued to October 17, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. Based on the representation of counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including, the October 17, 2011, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Faustino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
No. CR-S-11-0304-WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Faustino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NATANAEL FAUSTINO Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S-11-0304-WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)