Opinion
No. 20-6616
09-25-2020
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAXIMILLIAN ROBBINS FARROW, Defendant - Appellant.
Maximillian Robbins Farrow, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00120-LMB-1) Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maximillian Robbins Farrow, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Following his guilty plea, Maximillian Robbins Farrow was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. At Farrow's September 2017 sentencing, the district court imposed a 48-month term of imprisonment. Farrow did not appeal the criminal judgment. Instead, in April 2019, Farrow filed a self-styled motion for clarification of the manner in which the court applied the Sentencing Guidelines in his case. The district court denied this motion on various grounds, and Farrow now appeals that order.
Upon review, we discern no error in the district court's rationale for denying Farrow's motion for clarification. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Farrow, No. 1:17-cr-00120-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED