From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fanklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the New Jersey
Mar 13, 2012
Crim. No. 09-446(WHW) (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 09-446(WHN)

03-13-2012

United States of America v. Fanklin


Date of Previous Judgment: _______________

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)

USM No: _______________

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [√] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[] DENIED. [] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of _______________ months is reduced to _______________ I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Previous Offense Level: ¦Amended Offense Level: ¦ +-----------------------------------+----------------------------------¦ ¦Criminal History Category: ¦Criminal History Category: ¦ +-----------------------------------+----------------------------------¦ ¦Previous Guideline Range: to months¦Amended Guideline Range: to months¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

[] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

[] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

[] Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated _______________ shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: _______________

(if different from order date)

_______________

Judge's signature

_______________

Printed name and title


Summaries of

United States v. Fanklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the New Jersey
Mar 13, 2012
Crim. No. 09-446(WHW) (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Fanklin

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Fanklin

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the New Jersey

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

Crim. No. 09-446(WHW) (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2012)