Opinion
24-6780
10-16-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILLIP EUGENE EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.
Phillip Eugene Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: October 10, 2024
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-cr-00356-D-4)
Phillip Eugene Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Phillip Eugene Evans appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Evans' motion. See United States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Evans, No. 5:19-cr-00356-D-4 (E.D. N.C. Aug. 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED