Opinion
1:21-cr-20580-GAYLES/TORRES
08-17-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN DOMINGO EUSEBIO and JOSE MANUEL MENDEZ, Defendants.
ORDER
DARRIN P. GAYLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres' Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [ECF No. 31]. On May 26, 2022, Defendants Juan Domingo Eusebio and Jose Manuel Mendez filed their Joint Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (the “Motion”). [ECF No. 23]. The matter was referred to Judge Torres, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a Report and Recommendation. [ECF No. 24]. On July 27, 2022, Judge Torres issued his Report recommending that the Motion be denied. Defendants timely filed objections to the Report. [ECF No. 34]. The Government filed a response. [ECF No. 35].
A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F.Supp.2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006).
Having conducted a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees with Judge Torres' well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that Defendants' Motion should be denied.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
(1) Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres' Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 31], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference.
(2) Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss the Indictment, [ECF No. 23], is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.