From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Estrella-Avina

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 16, 2006
171 F. App'x 575 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Maria Suzanna Davila, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff--Appellee.

Matthew John McGuire, Esq., Patagonia, AZ, for Defendant--Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-02350-CRR/GEE.

Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Horacio Estrella-Avina appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an alien in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(b)(5)(B) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction to review the district court's denial of Estrella-Avina's motion to suppress under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The district court properly denied the motion to suppress because the police officer who stopped Estrella-Avina had reasonable suspicion to justify the traffic stop. The district court did not err in characterizing the officer's conduct in stopping Estrella-Avina as a mistake of fact. See United States v. Miguel, 368 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir.2004); cf. United States v. Lopez-Soto, 205 F.3d 1101, 1106 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Estrella-Avina

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 16, 2006
171 F. App'x 575 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Estrella-Avina

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Horacio ESTRELLA-AVINA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 16, 2006

Citations

171 F. App'x 575 (9th Cir. 2006)