From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Estrada-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 16, 2014
563 F. App'x 296 (5th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-40975

04-16-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-328-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pedro Estrada-Rodriguez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2374 (2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, this court, relying upon its holding in United States v. Joslin, 487 F. App'x 139, 141-43 (5th Cir. 2012) (unpublished), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 1847 (2013), rejected the argument that the Texas offense of "burglary of a habitation" is outside the generic, contemporary definition of "burglary of a dwelling" under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the "owner" of a habitation as a person with a "greater right to possession." Accordingly, Estrada-Rodriguez's unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Estrada-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 16, 2014
563 F. App'x 296 (5th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Estrada-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 16, 2014

Citations

563 F. App'x 296 (5th Cir. 2014)