United States v. Espinoza-Estrada

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIN ESPINOZA-ESTRADA, Defendant…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Mar 24, 2014

12CR1925-AJB (S.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2014)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIN ESPINOZA-ESTRADA, Defendant. No. 12CR1925-AJB Usdc No. 13-50061. United States District Court, S.D. California. March 24, 2014.

          JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

          ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, Magistrate Judge.

         IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

         ___ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or

         X the Court has dismissed the Indictment per the ruling of the Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit and Orders that the previous Judgment filed on 02/12/13 be Vacated.

         ___ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or

         ___ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or

         ___ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or

         ___ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;

         ___ of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment/Information:

_____________________________________________________________________________

         IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.