From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Espindola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09-cr-00380-WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-cr-00380-WBS

09-16-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. URIEL OCHOA ESPINDOLA, JOSE SERGIO ESPINDOLA, ARMANDO ESPINDOLA, AND VALENTIN RAMIREZ-CARDINEZ. Defendants.

Preciliano Martinez Attorney for Defendant URIEL OCHOA ESPINDOLA Michael Beckwith Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff Jeffrey Rosenblum Matthew Bockmon Attorney for Defendant JOSE SERGIO ESPINDOLA John Duree Attorney for Defendant ARMANDO ESPINDOLA Robert Forkner Attorney for Defendant VALENTIN RAMIREZ CARDINEZ


PRECILIANO MARTINEZ

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

URIEL OCHOA ESPINDOLA

STIPULATION [PROPOSED ORDER] TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Dept.: 5

Honorable William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Michael Beckwith, Counsel for Plaintiff, Attorney Preciliano Martinez, Counsel for Defendant Uriel Ochoa Espindola, Attorney Jeffrey Rosenblum, Counsel for Defendant Jose Sergio Espindola, Attorney John Duree, Counsel for Armando Espindola, and Attorney Robert Forkner, Counsel for Defendant Valentin Ramirez Cardinez, that the Status Conference date scheduled for September 19, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. be vacated and the Status Conference be continued to this court's calendar on October 24, 2011 at 8:30 a.m. Additional time is needed for attorneys to negotiate plea agreements.

The court is advised that counsel have conferred about this request that they have agreed to the court date of October 24, 2011 and that Mr. Beckwith, Mr. Rosenblum, Mr. Duree, and Mr. Forkner have authorized Preciliano Martinez to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

The parties agree and stipulate that time should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Local Code T4 for completion of plea negotiations, up to and including October 24, 2011.

Respectfully Submitted,

Preciliano Martinez

Attorney for Defendant

URIEL OCHOA ESPINDOLA

Michael Beckwith

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

Jeffrey Rosenblum

Matthew Bockmon

Attorney for Defendant

JOSE SERGIO ESPINDOLA

John Duree

Attorney for Defendant

ARMANDO ESPINDOLA

Robert Forkner

Attorney for Defendant

VALENTIN RAMIREZ

CARDINEZ

ORDER

Having read and considered the foregoing stipulation, IT IS THE ORDER of the Court that the current September 19, 2011 Status Conference hearing is hereby vacated and reset to October 24, 2011.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Espindola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09-cr-00380-WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Espindola

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. URIEL OCHOA ESPINDOLA, JOSE SERGIO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-cr-00380-WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)