Summary
explaining that the court was not "aware of a judicial decision extending Padilla to the context here—the denial of a citizenship application" and declining to extend Padilla to that context
Summary of this case from State v. AddaquayOpinion
No. 13-7942
05-22-2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN JEROME ESCOFFERY, Defendant - Appellant.
Sean Jerome Escoffery, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:98-cr-0012 6-BO-1) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Jerome Escoffery, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sean Jerome Escoffery appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Escoffery, No. 5:98-cr-00126-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED