From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Epperson

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Mar 12, 2024
3:20-cr-00055-SLG (D. Alaska Mar. 12, 2024)

Opinion

3:20-cr-00055-SLG

03-12-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RACHEL TORREY DANIELLE EPPERSON, Defendant.


ORDER RE MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF FEDERAL DETAINER

SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court at Docket 164 is Defendant Epperson's Motion for Removal of Federal Detainer. The Government responded in opposition to the motion at Docket 165.

For the reasons set forth in the Government's opposition, the motion is DENIED. Although it appears that the State Superior Court intended the federal term to be served concurrent to the state sentence,this Court clearly ordered that the federal sentence be served consecutive to the state sentence. That is expressly stated in the Judgment of Conviction.In addition, this Court recently reviewed a draft transcript of that portion of the sentencing hearing that confirmed that, after discussion of this issue on the record with both parties, this Court intended for and ordered that the federal sentence run consecutive to the state sentence.

See Docket 164-1 (state court sentencing document).

Docket 94 at 2 (Judgment of Conviction).

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

United States v. Epperson

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Mar 12, 2024
3:20-cr-00055-SLG (D. Alaska Mar. 12, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Epperson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RACHEL TORREY DANIELLE EPPERSON…

Court:United States District Court, District of Alaska

Date published: Mar 12, 2024

Citations

3:20-cr-00055-SLG (D. Alaska Mar. 12, 2024)