From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Endicott

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Jul 20, 2012
Docket No. CR.S-09-00137 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. CR.S-09-00137 MCE

07-20-2012

United States v. Thomas S. Endicott


ORDER TERMINATING

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

and/or

AUTHORIZATION FOR

DISTRIBUTION OF

AVAILABLE PRIVATE

FUNDS

WHEREAS, Jan Karowsky (and Pete Kmeto) was appointed as counsel for the above defendant/petitioner, on the 31 day of July , 2009; and

WHEREAS, the court finds that funds are available from or on behalf of the above named defendant/petitioner for payment of compensation and expenses of court-appointed counsel and/or for other services necessary for adequate representation, and that the above defendant/petitioner is therefore financially able to obtain counsel or to make partial payment for representation, and/or for other services necessary for adequate representation;

IT IS THEREFORE: Check one or both [] ORDERED that the appointment of said counsel is hereby terminated,

[√] AUTHORIZED/DIRECTED that such funds in the amount of $ 30,642.11 be paid by said defendant/petitioner or by September 1, 2012as follows:

(enter specific terms of repayment, i.e., date due if lump-sum payment; schedule and amounts of each payment if installment payment.)

PAYMENT DUE IMMEDIATELY TO: Clerk of Court
U.S. District Court - Eastern District of California
501 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

ATTN: CJA General Fund

________________

United States Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Endicott

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Jul 20, 2012
Docket No. CR.S-09-00137 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Endicott

Case Details

Full title:United States v. Thomas S. Endicott

Court:United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

Docket No. CR.S-09-00137 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)