From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Elder

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Feb 27, 2019
No. 17-2207 (7th Cir. Feb. 27, 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-2207

02-27-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MATTHEW ELDER, Defendant-Appellant.


NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 Before JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN, District Judge Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division. No. 3:13-cr-00017-RLY-CMM-8 Richard L. Young, Judge.

Of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. --------

ORDER

On August 15, 2018, this court ordered a limited remand under the procedure set forth in United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir. 2005), so that the district court could state on the record whether it would impose the same sentence in light of this court's conclusion that the appellant, Matthew Elder, was not subject to a twenty-year mandatory minimum sentence. United States v. Elder, 900 F.3d 491, 504 (7th Cir. 2018). The district court has replied that it wishes to further review its sentencing determination in light of this court's conclusion and requests that the case be remanded for resentencing. Accordingly, pursuant to Paladino, the court VACATES Mr. Elder's sentence and REMANDS the case to the district court for resentencing.


Summaries of

United States v. Elder

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Feb 27, 2019
No. 17-2207 (7th Cir. Feb. 27, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Elder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MATTHEW ELDER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2019

Citations

No. 17-2207 (7th Cir. Feb. 27, 2019)