From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Edwards

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 6, 2023
1:17-cv-01105-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2023)

Opinion

1:17-cv-01105-AWI-SKO

03-06-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID J. EDWARDS, ET AL., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY REMAINDER OF ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

On March 5, 2020, the Court issued a stipulated order dismissing the Sixth Claim for Relief in this action. Doc. No. 65. There has been no docketed activity in this case in the three years since.

Plaintiff United States of America is, therefore, ORDERED to show in writing, within 10 calendar days of the date of electronic service of this order, why the remainder of this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

If the United States fails to make that showing, or otherwise provide a meaningful response to this order within the period of time specified above, the remainder of this action will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this action will be CLOSED without further notice to the parties. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423-24 (9th Cir. 1986) (affirming dismissal with prejudice for lack of prosecution).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Edwards

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 6, 2023
1:17-cv-01105-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID J. EDWARDS, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 6, 2023

Citations

1:17-cv-01105-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2023)