From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Edwards

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 30, 2015
605 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6623

06-30-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CELIA HAYNES EDWARDS, a/k/a Tina Hawks, Defendant - Appellant.

Celia Haynes Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Franklin Evans, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00038-JPJ-PMS-3; 1:12-cr-00030-JPJ-PMS-1) Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Celia Haynes Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Franklin Evans, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Celia Haynes Edwards appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration of the court's sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and to Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Edwards

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 30, 2015
605 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CELIA HAYNES EDWARDS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 30, 2015

Citations

605 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015)