From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Eddings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 16, 2018
2:16cr00004-008 (W.D. Pa. May. 16, 2018)

Opinion

2:16cr00004-008

05-16-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMAL EDDINGS


Electronic Filing

MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2018, upon due consideration of defendant Jamal Eddings' post-sentence motion for a new trial, IT IS ORDERED that [752] the motion be, and the same hereby is, denied.

A notice pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 was not filed against defendant and his sentence was based entirely on the application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In fact, defendant enjoys a considerable benefit with regard to the sentence he did receive, which was a substantial variance from the advisory Career Offender sentencing range of 151 to 188 months. And any question about the inapplicability of the protections afforded by the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial definitively was resolved adversely to defendant's current position in Beckles v. United States, -- U.S. --, 137 S. Ct. 886 (2017). Consequently, his motion is without merit and properly has been denied.

s/David Stewart Cercone

David Stewart Cercone

Senior United States District Judge Cc: Heidi Grogan, AUSA

Brian D. Aston, Esquire

United States Probation Office

United States Marshal Service

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

United States v. Eddings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 16, 2018
2:16cr00004-008 (W.D. Pa. May. 16, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Eddings

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMAL EDDINGS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 16, 2018

Citations

2:16cr00004-008 (W.D. Pa. May. 16, 2018)