From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Earnest

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 24, 2015
CR 14-00529 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)

Opinion

          MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, DAVID R. CALLAWAY, Chief, Criminal Division, BRIGID S. MARTIN, Assistant United States Attorney, Oakland, California, Attorneys for United States of America.


          NOTICE OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

          PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

         With leave of the Court, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California dismisses without prejudice the Indictment returned against the defendant in the above-captioned matter. This federal charge has been realleged along with other charges against this defendant, as well as other defendants in a Superseding Indictment returned in case CR 12-00574 PJH, United States v. Dionte Houff, Houston Nathaniel III, John Daniels, and Jermaine Earnest.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         Based upon the motion of the United States, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that leave is granted to the United States to dismiss without prejudice the above-captioned Indictment.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Earnest

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 24, 2015
CR 14-00529 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Earnest

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERMAINE EARNEST, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Jun 24, 2015

Citations

CR 14-00529 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)