Opinion
22-7266
01-20-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROY LEE DYKES, Defendant-Appellant.
Roy Lee Dykes, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Suzanne Kerney-Quillen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: January 17, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00003-JPJ-PMS-1)
Roy Lee Dykes, Appellant Pro Se.
Martha Suzanne Kerney-Quillen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roy Lee Dykes appeals the district court's order denying his motions for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and to conduct related discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court's order. United States v. Dykes, No. 2:18-cr-00003-JPJ-PMS-1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED