From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dwyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 7, 2012
CR No.: 3:07-155-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 3:07-155-JFA

02-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARTIN LEROY DWYER


ORDER

Upon motion of the defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion (ECF No. 1600) is DENIED. The defendant's guideline range was based upon his being found to be a Career Offender. Therefore, defendant's Guidelines sentencing range, adopted by this court at sentencing, is unaffected by Amendment 750.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 7, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Dwyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 7, 2012
CR No.: 3:07-155-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Dwyer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARTIN LEROY DWYER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 7, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 3:07-155-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2012)