From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dutton-Myrie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 14, 2012
NO. 3:07-cr-445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3:07-cr-445 NO. 3:11-cr-145

03-14-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. LUIS ANTONIO DUTTON-MYRIE, Defendant.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)

MEMORANDUM ORDER

On February 10, 2012, Defendant Luis Antonio Dutton-Myrie filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody. (Doc. 145.) It appears, however, that the above-captioned action is currently on direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. (Doc. 137.) As district courts should only consider a § 2255 motion in "extraordinary circumstances" while a direct appeal is pending, see Kline v. United States, No. 04CR269, 2006 WL 680842 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2006); see also Kapral v. United States, 166 F.3d 565, 570 (3d Cir.1999) ("collateral attack [under § 2255] is generally inappropriate if the possibility of further direct review remains open: A district court should not entertain a habeas corpus petition while there is an appeal pending in [the court of appeals] or in the Supreme Court"), and Defendant has presented no such "extraordinary circumstances," Defendant's motion to vacate (Doc. 83) will be dismissed as premature.

An appropriate order follows.

_______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Dutton-Myrie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 14, 2012
NO. 3:07-cr-445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Dutton-Myrie

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. LUIS ANTONIO DUTTON-MYRIE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

NO. 3:07-cr-445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2012)