From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Duran-Valdez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
NO. 1:11-cr-0004 LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 1:11-cr-0004 LJO

08-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GLORIA DURAN-VALDEZ, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney YASHAR NILCHIAN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender ANN H. VORIS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Gloria Duran-Valdez


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

ANN H. VORIS, Bar #100433

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

GLORIA DURAN-VALDEZ

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for August 5, 2011, may be continued to August 19, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

This reason for the continuance is to permit further negotiation and investigation. Counsel reviewed the offer with Ms. Duran-Valdez and because Ms. Duran-Valdez is terminally ill, she needed more time to review it before signing. As Ms. Duran-Valdez is currently housed at Lerdo, counsel also provided medical records and information to the U.S. Probation Officer. We are exploring whether to set for trial, plead, or proceed with current offer.

This continuance will conserve time and resources for both parties and the court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(ii), and (iv).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

YASHAR NILCHIAN

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

ANN H. VORIS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Gloria Duran-Valdez

ORDER

Good Cause exists. Time is excluded pursuant to §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(ii), and (iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Duran-Valdez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
NO. 1:11-cr-0004 LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Duran-Valdez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GLORIA DURAN-VALDEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

NO. 1:11-cr-0004 LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)