From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Duran-Avina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2011
NO. CR. S-05-044-FCD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CR. S-05-044-FCD

09-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FELIPE DURAN-AVINA, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Public Defender COURTNEY FEIN Attorney for FELIPE DURAN-AVINA BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

COURTNEY FEIN, Bar #244785

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

FELIPE DURAN-AVINA

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: September 12, 2011

Time: 10:00 am.

Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHELE BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN, attorney for FELIPE DURAN-AVINA, that the final dispositional hearing set for September 6, 2011 be rescheduled for September 12, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow both counsel additional time to receive and review the dispositional memorandum and to give defense counsel time to review the memorandum with the defendant. Defense counsel missed today's appearance as a result of mistakenly calendaring today's appearance for 9/16/11 and apologizes to the court and the government for this error.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Public Defender

COURTNEY FEIN

Attorney for FELIPE DURAN-AVINA

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the September 6, 2011, dispositional hearing be continued to September 12, 2011, at 10:00 am. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Duran-Avina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2011
NO. CR. S-05-044-FCD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Duran-Avina

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FELIPE DURAN-AVINA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

NO. CR. S-05-044-FCD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)