From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dunston

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2016
No. 15-13709 (11th Cir. Sep. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-13709

09-29-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLINTON JAMES DUNSTON, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00171-RBD-GJK-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender's Office, through attorney Conrad Kahn, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant in this appeal of the district court's denial of a motion to reduce sentence brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of the motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Dunston

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2016
No. 15-13709 (11th Cir. Sep. 29, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Dunston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLINTON JAMES DUNSTON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 29, 2016

Citations

No. 15-13709 (11th Cir. Sep. 29, 2016)