From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
No. CR 10-00894 LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR 10-00894 LHK

10-18-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN DUNN, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division ALLISON MARSTON DANNER (CABN 195046) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)

United States Attorney

MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)

Chief, Criminal Division

ALLISON MARSTON DANNER (CABN 195046)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE FROM OCTOBER 19, 2011 TO NOVEMBER 30, 2011


Court: The Hon. Lucy H. Koh

There is currently a status date scheduled in the above-captioned matter on October 19, 2011. Government and defense counsel jointly move the vacate the current status date and to set a new status date of November 30, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Both the government and defense counsel continue to investigate this matter and to negotiate and appropriate disposition for the case. The parties agree that the time between October 19, 2011 and November 30, 2011 is properly excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 United States Code, sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) as reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into the account the exercise of due diligence, and that the interests of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

ALLISON MARSTON DANNER

Assistant United States Attorney

EUGENE MARTINEZ

Attorney for RYAN DUNN

For the foregoing reasons, the Court continues the next status conference in this case from October 19, 2011 to November 30, 2011 at 10 a.m. For the reasons stated above, the Court further finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(7)(iv). Accordingly, time shall be excluded from October 19, 2011 through November 30, 2011.

SO ORDERED.

LUCY H. KOH

Judge, United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
No. CR 10-00894 LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN DUNN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

No. CR 10-00894 LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)