From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dunn

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 26, 2020
No. 20-10940 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-10940

08-26-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYKIEF LASHAWN DUNN, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00089-WS-B-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Before GRANT, LUCK, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Patricia Kemp, appointed counsel for Tykief Dunn in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dunn's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. The government's motion to dismiss the appeal based on the appeal waiver in Dunn's plea agreement is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

United States v. Dunn

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 26, 2020
No. 20-10940 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYKIEF LASHAWN DUNN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

No. 20-10940 (11th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

Dunn v. United States

(Doc. 62 at 2). Upon review, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found no arguable issues of merit, granted…