Opinion
3:06-CR-00456-FDW
02-29-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TARVIS LEVITICUS DUNHAM, Defendant.
ORDER
Frank D. Whitney United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Amend Payment Schedule (Doc. No. 58). This matter has been fully briefed, (Doc. No. 61), and is ripe for ruling. Defendant filed the same motion in another case, 3:00-cr-00060, which the Court denied. Order, United States v. Dunham, Case No. 3:00-cr-00060 (W.D. N.C. June 14, 2023), Doc. No. 47. Upon review of Defendant's motion and the arguments therein, it appears Defendant sought relief from his restitution payments only in Case No. 3:00-cr-00060, not in this case. Further, for the same reasons set forth in the Court's Order in case number 3:00-cr-00060, Defendant's motion is procedurally improper because the Court does not have jurisdiction over the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Amend Payment Schedule, (Doc. No. 58), is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.