From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 5, 2011
Civil 2:10-cv-1965-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011)

Opinion

          Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney, Adam R. Smart, Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C., Attorneys for the United States of America.

          Timothy Fitzgibbon, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, California, Attorneys for Defendant, Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects.


          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 83 and Local Rule 143 the parties hereby stipulate and agree to continue the hearing on Defendant's motion to stay proceedings, presently set for January 12, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., until February 9, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. The reason for this continuance is that counsel for the United States is presently in a trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that will conflict with the presently scheduled date and time for the hearing. Wherefore, the parties request that, consistent with this stipulation, the Court continue the hearing presently set for January 12, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. to February 9, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 5, 2011
Civil 2:10-cv-1965-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Dreyfuss & Blackford Architects

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DREYFUSS & BLACKFORD ARCHITECTS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 5, 2011

Citations

Civil 2:10-cv-1965-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2011)