From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Doyle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Nov 30, 2022
4:22-CR-06004-MKD-1 (E.D. Wash. Nov. 30, 2022)

Opinion

4:22-CR-06004-MKD-1

11-30-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL JAMES DOYLE (1), Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEAS AND SETTING SENTENCING SCHEDULE ECF NO. 134

MARY K. DIMKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On November 10, 2022, Daniel James Doyle (1) appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Alexander C. Ekstrom and entered pleas of guilty to the following three counts of the Indictment filed on February 1, 2022: Count Three, charging him Unlawful User of a Controlled Substance in Possession of a Firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(3), 924(a)(2); Count Six, charging him with Possession with Intent to Distribute 50 Grams or More of Actual Methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii); and Count 7, charging him with Possession with Intent to Distribute Fentanyl, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Defendant executed a written waiver of the right to enter his pleas of guilty before the presiding United States District Judge and a written consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 130. Defendant was represented by Jennifer Barnes and Paul Shelton. Assistant United States Attorney Timothy Ohms appeared on behalf of the United States.

United States Magistrate Judge Ekstrom filed a Report and Recommendation on November 15, 2022, ECF No. 134, finding the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges and consequences of the plea, and that the plea of guilty is knowing, voluntary, is not induced by fear, coercion, or ignorance, and is supported by an independent basis in fact establishing each of the essential elements of the crime.

The Court adopts United States Magistrate Judge Ekstroms's report and recommendation, ECF No. 134, and accepts Defendant's pleas of guilty.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. A sentencing hearing is set for April 27, 2023, at 2:30 p.m., in Richland Courtroom 189. Absent truly exigent circumstances, the Court will not consider a request for a continuance of sentencing unless: (1) the request is made by written motion, (2) in accordance with LCivR 7, and (3) the motion and supporting declaration are filed at least seven (7) days before the scheduled sentencing hearing.

2. Defendant shall remain released to pretrial supervision pursuant to the release conditions previously set. ECF Nos. 42, 90, 91, 138. If a sentence of incarceration is imposed, Defendant shall be taken into custody at the time of sentencing.

3. The United States Probation Office shall prepare a Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c).

4. Not later than March 21, 2023, the Probation Officer shall disclose the PSR to Defendant, counsel for Defendant, and the United States. Disclosure of the PSR shall be subject to the limitations imposed by Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

5. Within 14 days of the disclosure of the PSR, counsel shall communicate in writing to the Probation Office (and opposing counsel) any objections they may have as to legal and factual errors or omissions; sentencing classifications; sentencing guideline ranges; and policy statements contained in or omitted from the report. Objections shall be numbered and identify the paragraph(s) to which the objection applies. Objections shall address the PSR in sequential order, beginning with the lowest numbered paragraph. If an objection is filed, the Probation Officer shall conduct such additional investigation as is necessary to assess the merits of the objection.

6. The Probation Officer shall submit the final PSR to the Court by April 17, 2023. The PSR shall be accompanied by an addendum setting forth any objections counsel may have made, including those that have not been resolved, together with the officer's comments and recommendations thereon. The Probation Officer shall certify that the contents of the report, other than the sentencing recommendations, including any revisions or addenda, have been disclosed to counsel for Defendant and the United States, and that the addendum fairly states any remaining objections. Except with respect to any written objection made as required above, the PSR and computations shall be accepted by the Court as accurate. Upon a timely objection by Defendant, the United States bears the burden of proof on any fact that is necessary to establish the base offense level. The Court, however, for good cause shown, may allow that a new objection be raised at any time before the imposition of sentence. In resolving any disputed issues of fact, the Court may consider any reliable information presented by the Probation Officer, Defendant, or the United States.

Nothing in this Order requires the disclosure of any portions of the PSR that are not disclosable under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32. The PSR shall be deemed to have been disclosed: (1) when a copy of the report is physically delivered; or (2) one day after the report's availability for inspection is orally communicated; or (3) three days after a copy of the report or notice of its availability is mailed to counsel, whichever date is earlier.

7. Not later than April 12, 2023, counsel shall file and serve all motions and memoranda pertaining to Defendant's sentence, including departures and variances, and sentencing recommendations.

a. Counsel shall utilize the following format when preparing initial sentencing memoranda which are limited to 20 pages (absent prior Court permission to file an overlength brief): I. Offense Level & Criminal History, II. Departures, III. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

b. Under Section I. Offense Level & Criminal History, counsel shall discuss whether the PSR's Total Offense Level calculations (not including departures) and Criminal History calculation are correct or incorrect, providing legal authority for the party's position.

c. Under Section II. Departures, counsel shall discuss whether a downward and/or upward departure is warranted under the Guidelines and provide legal authority for such position.

d. Under Section III. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), counsel shall discuss whether the resulting guideline range provides a reasonable sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary to comply with the purposes set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2), considering the other factors listed in § 3553(a).

e. FAILURE TO FILE AND SERVE SENTENCING MATERIAL BY THIS DATE, TO INCLUDE MOTIONS OR MEMORANDA FOR UPWARD OR DOWNWARD DEPARTURE, WILL BE DEEMED A WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO DO SO.

8. Not later than April 20, 2023, the opposing party shall file and serve its response limited to no more than seven (7) pages. 9. If Defendant intends to qualify for the safety valve, the parties must schedule a meeting to conduct a safety valve interview to determine if the Defendant has met the requirements of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5) no later than April 6, 2023.

10. If either party intends to call witnesses or proffer exhibits at sentencing, witness and exhibit lists must be exchanged by the parties and provided to the Court no later April 20, 2023.

11. Sentencings shall be scheduled for a total of 45 minutes. If it is believed that the sentencing hearing will last longer than 45 minutes, counsel shall contact Chambers no later than April 20, 2023.

12. All pending motions pertaining to Defendant are DENIED as moot and all pending hearing and trial dates pertaining to Defendant are STRICKEN from the Court's calendar.

13. By and through this Order, the District Court Executive is authorized to accept Defendant's payment in the amount of $100 per count, for a total of $300.00, toward Special Penalty Assessments.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is hereby directed to enter this Order and provide copies to counsel, the United States Probation Office, and the United States Marshals Service.


Summaries of

United States v. Doyle

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Nov 30, 2022
4:22-CR-06004-MKD-1 (E.D. Wash. Nov. 30, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Doyle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL JAMES DOYLE (1), Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

4:22-CR-06004-MKD-1 (E.D. Wash. Nov. 30, 2022)